Legal Opinion
The State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc., the State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 7, 2005No. 04-35229, 04-35238PublishedCited by 93 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge.
In its appeal, the Idaho Potato Commission (“IPC”) challenges the district court’s ruling that a no-challenge provision in its certification mark licensing agreement with'G & T Terminal Packaging (“G & T”) is unenforceable. G & T appeals several damages awards to IPC for breach of contract and violation of the Lanham Act, as well as an award of attorney’s fees and costs. We have jurisdiction over these appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Agreeing with the Second Circuit in Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales, 335 F.3d 130(2d Cir.2003) (M & M III),…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fujitsu Limited v. Federal Express CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chew v. GatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by93 opinions
- Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. Akanoc Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Columbia Pictures, Inc. v. BunnellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- In Re the Nomination Petitions & Papers of StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- DirecTV, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Huppert v. City of PittsburgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.