Legal Opinion
Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farms & Sales
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 26, 2000No. 97 CIV. 8125(CLB), 98 CIV. 0681(CLB) and 98 CIV. 2934(CLB)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
BRIEANT, District Judge.
Before this Court for decision is the second motion by the Idaho Potato Commission, represented by the Attorney General of the State of Idaho, for relief under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, representing the third attempt by the Idaho Potato Commission (hereinafter the “IPC”) to assert Eleventh Amendment immunity.
Familiarity on the part of the reader with this Court’s prior decisions, Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farms & Sales, 35 F.Supp.2d, 313 (S.D.N.Y. January 22, 1999) (First Opinion) denying IPC’s motion to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc., the State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Hapco Farms, Inc. v. Idaho Potato CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & SalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & SalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- State v. G&T Terminal Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005