Legal Opinion

Walker v. City of Waterbury

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 21, 2006No. 304CV1477MRKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

KRAVITZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this case are firefighters who allege that their employer, the City of Waterbury (“the City”), deprived them of their right to substantive due process and equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment by altering the terms of their retirement benefits. They bring this lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking mon ey damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs as a result of the claimed violation of their constitutional rights. This case has been considered, though not formally consolidated, with Laccone v. City of Waterbury, 3:04-CV-2139…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Lake Country Estates, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Alice Peck Day Memorial Hospital v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API