Legal Opinion

In Re Coordinated Latex Glove Litigation

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 15, 2002No. D036680, D037435PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

In this opinion we discuss the two-pronged test for a strict liability manufacturing defect as applied to the production of latex gloves. (Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413, 432 [143 Cal.Rptr. 225, 573 P.2d 443, 96 A.L.R.3d 1] (Barker).) This products liability action filed by plaintiff Christine McGinnis was the first to go to trial in a group of cases in coordinated proceedings involving allegations against various defendants who manufactured or distributed latex gloves, used by the plaintiffs at their work, that contained natural or artificial substances…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Brown v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Garrett v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Lucas v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  3. Marroquin v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
  4. Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Tapia v. Davol, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2015

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API