Legal Opinion

Karlsson v. Ford Motor Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 27, 2006No. B173022PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

Defendant Ford Motor Company (Ford) appeals from the judgment entered after a jury verdict in this product liability action awarded plaintiff Johan Karlsson more than $30 million in compensatory and punitive damages. We hold that evidence and issue preclusion sanctions that were ordered against Ford for various discovery violations were properly imposed before trial. We also hold that those sanctions were, for the most part, properly applied during the trial in the form of jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, and plaintiff’s jury arguments, and that any errors by the court…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Soule v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1994
  4. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  5. People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Aundrey MEALS Ex Rel. William MEALS v. FORD MOTOR COMPANYTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Brown, Winfield & Canzoneri, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Lucas v. City of VisaliaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Lewis v. Fletcher Jones Motor Cars, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. Doe v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Cashel & EmlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API