Legal Opinion
Lucas v. City of Visalia
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 21, 2010No. 1:09-cv-1015PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON TASER INTERNATIONAL’S RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO DISMISS
ANTHONY W. ISHII, Chief Judge.
This is a civil rights lawsuit brought by Plaintiff Jesse Lucas (“Lucas”) against Defendants the City of Visalia (“the City”), Visalia police officers Carmen Esparza (“Esparza”) and Sean O’Rafferty (“O’Rafferty”), and Taser International, Inc. (“Taser Int.”). Lucas alleges violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and various state laws, including products liability. The Court granted in part and denied in part two prior motions to dismiss that had been filed by the City and its officers. The active complaint is…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Marroquin v. Pfizer, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Lassen v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Products Liability Litigation Coordinated Pretrial ProceedingsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Albee v. CONTINENTAL TIRE NORTH AMERICA, INC.District Court, E.D. California · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.