Legal Opinion

Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1971No. S.F. 22785PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

In this action for personal injuries, the jury returned a verdict for defendants. The trial court granted a motion for new trial, and defendants have appealed from the order granting the motion.

Plaintiff’s testimony may be summarized as follows: He purchased a stepladder from defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company, and kept the ladder in a storage room in his backyard. A few days before the accident he sought to use the ladder to prune a peach tree, but the ground was too muddy, and he desisted. The only other time he used the ladder was when he wanted to place some Christmas…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Elmore v. American Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API