Jiminez v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
In this action for personal injuries, the jury returned a verdict for defendants. The trial court granted a motion for new trial, and defendants have appealed from the order granting the motion.
Plaintiff’s testimony may be summarized as follows: He purchased a stepladder from defendant Sears, Roebuck & Company, and kept the ladder in a storage room in his backyard. A few days before the accident he sought to use the ladder to prune a peach tree, but the ground was too muddy, and he desisted. The only other time he used the ladder was when he wanted to place some Christmas…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Elmore v. American Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Pike v. Frank G. Hough Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by131 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.