Legal Opinion
Marroquin v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 14, 2019No. Case No. 1:18-CV-0974 AWI SABPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Anthony W. Ishii, SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE
The case stems from the death of Agapita Marroquin after she had taken the generic prescription drug amiodarone. Plaintiff Gilbert Marroquin, Mrs. Marroquin's husband, brings seven claims under California law against Defendants Pfizer, Inc. ("Pfizer") and Mylan Institutional, Inc. ("Mylan") for strict products liability, negligence *1157based products liability, breach of warranty, intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and concealment. The active complaint is the First Amended Complaint ("FAC"). Both defendants have filed a Rule 12(b)(6)…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Grancare v. Ruth ThrowerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Geographic Expeditions, Inc. v. Estate of LhotkaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- (PS) Holcomb v. Pfizer Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Blain Lomen v. Thomas P. SchmalzriedDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Bounds v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Bueno v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Chryssos v. Horizon Therapeutics USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.