Rosenthal v. Rambo
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Marion Superior Court; J. L. MeMaster, J udge. Action by Moses Rosentfial against G-. II. Rambo and others on a promissory note. Erom a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.
J. — This was an action brought by the appellant to recover upon a note of $400, executed by the other appellees to J. Crouch & Son, and by Crouch & Son, before maturity, for value, sold and assigned to appellant. The execution of the note was not denied. The issues were formed by answers of the defendants and reply thereto, and cross-complaints of the defendants and answer thereto. The answer to the complaint was in four paragraphs. The first paragraph was that the note -was given without any consideration. The second paragraph sets up that the various makers of the note in 1896 entered into…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Chance v. Isaacs & SmythNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- Bates v. PricketIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Shade v. CrevistonIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Merchants' & Mechanics' Savings Bank v. FrazeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Huston v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City National Bank v. Gunter Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Rosenthal v. RamboIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Wayne County National Bank v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- First National Bank v. ButteryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908