Shade v. Creviston

— The complaint of the appellant is based upon a note and mortgage and is in the usual form. The first paragraph of the appellee’s answer avers that the note and mortgage were executed to appellant’s assignor for the unpaid balance of purchase-money of the real estate described in the mortgage; that the appellee William Creviston, by whom the note was executed, ivas a young man without knowledge of the value of “ saw-mill property; ” that appellant’s as*592signor was an expert and knew the value of such property, and fraudulently represented that the saw mill, for which the note was executed, was…