Legal Opinion

Bates v. Pricket

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1854PublishedCited by 24 opinions

APPEAL from the Grant Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStuart, J.

Debt on an assigned note. The defendant pleaded the general issue with notice of set-off. The set-off consisted of three notes made by the payee of the note sued upon, and indorsed to the defendant Pricket. There was no date to the indorsements.

The only point made below, or in this Court, is, that these notes were not admissible as a set-off unless the defendant proved that they were assigned to him before the commencement of the suit.

The Court below admitted the notes without such proof, and gave judgment for Bates, deducting the set-off.

To reverse this judgment the third clause of sec. 204,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hurd v. EarlIndiana Supreme Court · 1841

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Worster v. CaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Pedigo v. GrimesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API