Legal Opinion
People v. Barraza
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 16, 1994No. A063911PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
With the support of the district attorney who successfully prosecuted him, appellant Jose Barraza moves for “stipulated reversal” of his misdemeanor conviction. We shall deny the motion.
After an eight-day trial in the San Francisco Superior Court, appellant was acquitted of attempted murder, attempted voluntary manslaughter and assault with a deadly weapon, but was convicted of the misdemeanor offense of carrying a loaded firearm in public. (Pen. Code, § 12031, subd. (a).) A timely notice of appeal was filed. Briefing in this court has not commenced. Appellant has at the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Neary v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. ORABUENACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. Hyung Joon KimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- People v. BenevidesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.