Legal Opinion

Hewitt v. Helms

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 19, 1987No. 85-1630PublishedCited by 932 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia

This case presents the peculiar-sounding question whether a party who litigates to judgment and loses on all of his claims can nonetheless be a “prevailing party” for purposes of an award of attorney’s fees.

Following a prison riot at the Pennsylvania State Correctional Institution at Huntingdon, inmate Aaron Helms was placed in administrative segregation, a form of restrictive custody, pending an investigation into his possible involvement in the disturbance. More than seven weeks later, a prison hearing committee, relying solely on an officer’s report of the testimony of an undisclosed…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by932 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990

927 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API