Legal Opinion

People v. ORABUENA

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 2004No. H025987PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McADAMS, J.

The Substance Abuse and Crime Prevention Act of 2000 (hereafter Proposition 36 or the Act) provides that persons convicted of certain nonviolent drug offenses shall be ordered to probation and receive drug treatment in lieu of incarceration. The Act excludes certain defendants from its purview, including someone like defendant Timothy Robert Orabuena who has been convicted in the same proceeding of a misdemeanor that is not related to the use of drugs. (Pen. Code, § 1210.1, subd. (b)(2).)

In this case, we consider whether the trial court has the discretion under Penal Code 1…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. OrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. People v. CarbajalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. ChavezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Kim v. EUROMOTORS WEST/THE AUTO GALLERYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Caverly v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. People v. ZeiglerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. AmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API