Neary v. Regents of University of California
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BAXTER, J.
While this appeal was pending in the Court of Appeal, the parties agreed to settle their dispute and jointly requested the Court of Appeal to reverse the trial court’s judgment in plaintiff’s favor. The Court of Appeal declined to do so. The issue is whether a Court of Appeal should grant a stipulated request by all parties pending appeal to set aside a trial court judgment in order to effectuate the parties’ agreement to settle their dispute and terminate further litigation. We hold that as a general rule parties are entitled to a stipulated reversal by the Court of Appeal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Walker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Coleman v. DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMININISTRATIONCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- The Nestle Company, Inc. v. Chester's Market, Inc. And Saccone's Toll House, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Bradley v. Chiron Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Woosley v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- People v. MassieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Lealao v. Beneficial California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.