Legal Opinion
Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 30, 1993No. 92-1123PublishedCited by 143 opinions
1Per curiam
In order to reach the merits of this case, we would have to address a question that was neither presented in the petition for certiorari nor fairly included in the one question that was presented. Because we will consider questions not raised in the petition only in the most exceptional cases, and because we conclude this is not such a case, we dismiss the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.
Petitioner was named as a defendant, along with respondent Windmere Corporation, in an action brought by respondent U. S. Philips Corporation in the District Court for the Southern District of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by143 opinions
- Wood v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Caspari v. BohlenSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Company Doe v. Public CitizenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.