Legal Opinion

Salisbury v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1971PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action to recover under the double indemnity provisions of an insurance policy which were applicable in case of accidental death. Defendant appealed from a judgment for plaintiff after a trial by the court.

Plaintiff’s decedent had cancer of the brain which rendered him weak, spastic, and unable to control his movements fully or to stand by himself. He was a bed patient in a nursing home. Side rails and a chest strap were used to keep him from getting out of bed. The trial court found that he had attempted to get up and, in so doing, became entangled with the chest strap, whereby he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seater v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Speer v. Western & Southern Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Wells v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. Perry v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Dickerson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arthurs v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Busto v. MANUFACTURERS LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Pope v. BENEFIT TRUST LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Orman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Huff v. Aetna Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API