Legal Opinion

Perry v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1970PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

This is an action by the beneficiary of a deceased insured upon a group accident policy issued by the defendant insurance company. The plaintiff appealed from a judgment entered pursuant to a jury verdict in defendant’s favor.

The policy provided benefits for death caused “* * * directly and independently of all other causes * * #” by accidental bodily injury. The policy also excluded loss from death “caused by or resulting from: * * * sickness or disease or medical or surgical treatment * *

On April 14, 1966, the insured was involved in a fairly minor automobile accident in which the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Penn v. Standard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. LaBarge v. United InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Hutchison v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Todd v. Occidental Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Draughon v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  2. Salisbury v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Tabler v. Standard Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Woolfolk v. IslerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Rodgers v. Nationwide InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API