Legal Opinion

Seater v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 16, 1945PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

Action by the beneficiary under two policies of life insurance, each in the sum of $1,000, with provision for double indemnity if the death of the insured should result solely from bodily injuries effected directly and exclusively by external, violent, and accidental means, such double indemnity not to be payable, however, if death resulted directly or indirectly from illness or disease of any kind, or from physical or mental infirmity. The insured, who was the wife of the plaintiff, died on March 29, 1943, at the age of upwards of sixty-one years. The insurance company paid the single…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Lewis v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Gilliland v. Ash Grove Lime & Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  5. In Re Estate of OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stroburg v. Insurance Company of North AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Callahan v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  3. State Land Board v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Haman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Hutchison v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1948

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API