Legal Opinion
Arthurs v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 15, 1991No. 90 Civ. 4597 (RWS)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Metropolitan”) has moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Catherine Arthurs (“Ar-thurs”). For the following reasons, the motion is denied.
THE PARTIES
Arthurs is the widow of Raymond Ar-thurs, who was, at the time of his death, employed as a splicer by the Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (“Con Ed”). Mr. Arthurs died on June 17, 1986, following his collapse while working in a Con Ed “vault” at the Port Authority Terminal in New York City.
Metropolitan is an insurance company…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Algie v. RCA Global Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Clark v. Bank of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Harrison v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- MacMillan v. Provident Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Phila.District Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- Scalamandre v. Oxford Health Plans (N.Y.), Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.