Legal Opinion

State v. Thomas

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1991No. 12591PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

APODACA, Judge.

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s orders entered in two separate criminal proceedings. Finding that defendant had violated the conditions of her probation, the trial court revoked probation and resentenced defendant. The court then suspended the sentence on certain conditions. In doing so, the court granted and denied defendant credit against her sentence for certain periods of time. Defendant has briefed only one of the two issues listed in the docketing statement. The issue not briefed is deemed abandoned. State v. Fish, 102 N.M. 775, 701 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.1985).…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. State v. OrtegaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. OsborneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. FishNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. In Re CoughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. GeeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. State v. NealNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. State v. CARLOS A.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. JimenezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. McDonaldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API