State v. Ortega
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MONTGOMERY, Justice.
In this case we rekindle the debate over one of the most controversial doctrines from the common law: the felony-murder rule. The rule in New Mexico is now statutory; and defendant Ortega, convicted below of two felony murders, attacks the statute as unconstitutional. He argues that the rule establishes a presumption of mens rea in violation of the Due Process Clause in the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution. Alternatively, he argues that the rule creates a strict-liability crime in violation of an asserted due-process requirement that serious,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- State v. RojoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SalazarNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.