Legal Opinion
In Re Coughlin
California Supreme Court
Decided February 4, 1976No. Crim. 18659PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, J.
In the present case, and in the companion case of In re Dunham, post, page 63 [127 Cal.Rptr. 343, 545 P.2d 255], we consider whether a court, at a probation revocation hearing, or the Adult Authority, at a parole revocation hearing {Dunham), may properly consider evidence indicating that the probationer or parolee has committed another criminal offense during the period of his probation or parole, despite the fact that he was acquitted of the criminal charge at trial. We have concluded that the consideration of such evidence (together with all other evidence bearing upon…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Lucido v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. MeltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Gikas v. ZolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.