State v. Neal
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Judge.
{1} This case requires us to determine whether the district court had jurisdiction to revoke Defendant’s probation. Resolution of this issue depends on the application of NMSA 1978, § 31-20-5(B) (2003). Section 31-20-5(B)(2) provides that if a defendant’s parole is revoked, “the period of parole served in the custody of a correctional facility shall not be credited as time served on probation.” The appeal involves two separate sentences, arising from two separate convictions. The essential issue is whether Defendant’s failure to successfully complete parole in one case…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. RiveraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. VarelaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. WoodwardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GreenNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. CooleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2023
- State v. DinapoliNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- State v. SosaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. DinapoliNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.