State v. McDonald
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
APODACA, Judge.
Defendant appeals from the trial court’s order revoking his suspended sentence, imposing the balance of his original eighteen-month sentence, and enhancing the original sentence by one year under our state’s habitual offender statute. On appeal, defendant argues that the trial court erred by enhancing defendant’s sentence and revoking his suspended sentence after he had completed his underlying sentence. Defendant essentially raises three sub-issues under this argument: (1) the trial court did not make an explicit finding that defendant was a fugitive under NMSA 1978,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moody v. DaggettSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. FranklinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. BoyerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. MaddoxNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. DuhonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. JimenezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- State v. ThomasNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.