State v. Gee
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WECHSLER, Chief Judge.
{1} We consolidate these appeals for opinion because they both raise issues of whether the district court committed fundamental error in giving the general intent jury instruction when a defendant is charged with a specific intent crime. Defendant Kevin Gee appeals his convictions for four counts of forgery. He argues on appeal that it was fundamental error for the district court to give both specific intent and general intent jury instructions when forgery is a specific intent crime. Gee additionally argues ineffective assistance of counsel. He contends that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. CunninghamNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BenallyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. AllenNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. ParishNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Lytle v. JordanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. GutierrezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BoergadineNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- State v. CaldwellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. StefaniNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. StefaniNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.