Legal Opinion

Daoud v. De Leau

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1997No. Docket Nos. 103247, 103248, Calendar No. 8PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

In a circuit court complaint, the plaintiff alleged that the principal defendants perjured themselves in an earlier probate court case, causing him to lose the parental rights to his child. The circuit court granted summary disposition for the defendants, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We likewise affirm. On these facts, the plaintiff has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted.

i

In August 1989, Carmel M. De Leau 1 became pregnant with the child of Ghassan H. Daoud. 2 They mar ried in Michigan, the ceremony taking place in September 1989.

At the time of these events, Mr.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kordis v. Auto Owners InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Rogoski v. City of MuskegonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Columbia Casualty Co. v. KlettkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fawcett v. AthertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Courtney v. FeldsteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Kessel v. LeavittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Wynn v. EarinWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Bruinsma v. Wigger (In re Wigger)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API