Legal Opinion
Wynn v. Earin
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 2008No. 78247-4PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
181 P.3d 806 (2008)
Pardner WYNN, Respondent,
v.
Jolene EARIN and John Doe Earin, wife and husband, and their marital community, Petitioners.
No. 78247-4.
Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.
April 3, 2008.
Christopher Joseph Kerley, Mary H. Spillane, William Kastner & Gibbs, James B. King, Evans, Craven & Lackie, P.S., Spokane, WA, for Petitioners.
Mary Elizabeth Schultz, Mary Schultz Law PS, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
MADSEN, J.
¶ 1 Petitioner Jolene Earin provided counseling to respondent Pardner Wynn, individually and then jointly with his wife. The Wynns divorced, and Ms. Earin provided…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Eaden v. Estate of EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.