Legal Opinion

Courtney v. Feldstein

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 10, 1985No. Docket 74434PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In a previous lawsuit, plaintiff, Karen Courtney, and defendant James Courtney (hereafter defendant) were divorced. One of the major issues in the divorce proceedings was the value of James Courtney’s property, including his interest in two corporations, Century 21 of Michigan, Inc., and Century 21-Hartford West, Inc. Based on the information Mr. Courtney supplied, the parties reached a property settlement in which Mr. Courtney’s interest in the two corporations was valued at $115,000. This property settlement was incorporated in the judgment of divorce. Plaintiff subsequently learned that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gose v. Monroe Auto Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gould v. Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Verplanck v. . Van BurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  4. Gursten v. KenneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Curry v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sprague v. BuhagiarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Sherrell v. BugaskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Daoud v. De LeauMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Romanski v. Detroit Entertainment, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. Triplett v. St AmourMichigan Supreme Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API