Legal Opinion
Wynn v. Earin
Washington Supreme Court
Decided April 3, 2008No. 78247-4PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*365¶1 Petitioner Jolene Earin provided counseling to respondent Pardner Wynn, individually and then jointly with his wife. The Wynns divorced, and Ms. Earin provided information obtained during the counseling to the guardian ad litem for the children. She also appeared and testified on Ms. Wynn’s behalf at the hearing to determine child placement. Mr. Wynn sued Ms. Earin for emotional distress resulting from alleged violations of the Uniform Health Care Information Act (Health Care Information Act or Act), chapter 70.02 RCW, and for negligence, alleging violations of the standard of care for…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tenney v. BrandhoveSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. KelleyWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Eaden v. Estate of EvansCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.