Rogoski v. City of Muskegon
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtBronson, J.
Loretta E. Rogoski filed a complaint alleging that defendants conspired to perpetrate a fraud upon her by agreeing that Elden Nedeau, an assessor for the City of Muskegon, would give false testimony concerning the value of Mrs. Rogoski’s property in a previous condemnation proceeding. The trial court summarily dismissed the suit, holding that, if it was characterized as an independent action for damages it failed to state a cause of action and, if the suit was characterized as an equitable action to set aside the previous judgment, it had to fail because it was untimely and plaintiff had not…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Allen v. AllenMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
- Fawcett v. AthertonMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Beatty v. BrookingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Kita v. MatuszakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
3Cited by19 opinions
- Meyer v. HubbellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cramer v. Metropolitan Savings Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sprague v. BuhagiarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re Paternity of TompkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Daoud v. De LeauMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.