Legal Opinion

In Re Osslo

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1958No. Crim. 6295PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

By application for habeas corpus petitioners Osslo and Meyer ask that they be relieved of the assertedly illegal restraint of probation orders and that the superior court be required to revoke probation and to sentence petitioners.1 The superior court determined that petitioners had ‘‘ accepted probation” and that the court would not “release them from it.” We have concluded that petitioners could disavow probation and demand sentence.

On August 9, 1956, a jury found petitioners guilty of conspiracy to commit assault and of assault by means likely to produce great bodily injury. As is…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re TrombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. People v. OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. In Re PetersenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. In Re SmileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. In Re BushmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. Tyrell J.California Supreme Court · 1994

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API