Legal Opinion

In Re Bine

California Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1957No. Crim. 5953PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHENK J.

This is a proceeding in habeas corpus to determine whether the court exceeded its jurisdiction in modifying the terms of petitioner’s probation.

Petitioner and four codefendants, Jarosh, Chapman, Sergent and Thrift, were charged with conspiracy to defraud certain insurance companies. Each pleaded guilty and requested probation. Probation reports were prepared in the probation department from information obtained from the defendants and from the investigation department of the district attorney’s office. At the probation hearing on June 18, 1956, the court stated that it had read the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re DixonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Phelan v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. In Re DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. In Re AntazoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. In Re De La OCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  5. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API