Legal Opinion

DeSimone v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1955No. Appeals, Nos. 303 and 304PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Musmanno,

The City of Philadelphia maintained in 1949 at 12th and Heed Streets a swimming pool which was 80 feet long, 40 feet wide and ranged from a wading shallowness at one end to a depth of over 5 feet at the other end. On Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays the pool was reserved for boys; on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays, girls had it for their exclusive use. A lifeguard attended on the boys’ days but not on girls’ days.

To this pool on Wednesday, June 29, 1949, came some 50 girls for relief from the heat of a glowing summer’s day and for the general enjoyment and fun…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Honaman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Scott v. American Express Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Hill v. Allentown Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Styer v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Paraska v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Casey v. GeigerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Geyer v. SteinbronnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Walsh v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Simmons v. MullenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Fahey v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API