Walsh v. City of Philadelphia
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*230OPINION
CAPPY, Justice.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the Recreation Use of Land and Water Act, 68 P.S. § 477-1 et seq. (hereinafter “RUA”), should apply to bar a claim for injuries sustained as a result of the negligent maintenance of a paved inner-city playground and recreation center. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the RUA does not bar the claim of the plaintiff. In making this determination, we reverse the order of the Commonwealth Court.
FACTS
The plaintiff, Thomas Walsh, Jr., was engaged in a game of “chase basketball” at the Guerin Recreational Center in the City…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. StanleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Love v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Rivera v. Philadelphia Theological Seminary of St. Charles Borromeo, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Tulewicz v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Dickens v. HornerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Lory v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- University of Alaska v. ShantiAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Mills v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.