Legal Opinion

Honaman v. Philadelphia

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 20, 1936No. Appeals, 278 and 279PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

Appellants, husband and wife, brought suit against the City of Philadelphia for injuries sustained by the wife, who was struck by a baseball while she was walking on a sidewalk along Fairmount Park. The city appealed to the Superior Court from judgments in favor of the plaintiff and the Superior Court reversed the judgments. An appeal to this court was allowed.

Parkside Avenue, about 200 feet north of 53d Street, forms one of the boundaries of Fairmount Park. East of the sidewalk, in the park, a baseball diamond was laid out so that the catcher stood only 8 or 10…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Augustine v. Town of BrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Fitzpatrick v. PenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Briegel v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  5. Pope v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Vann v. Board of EducationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Morris v. Mount Lebanon Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Hartness v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Hill v. Allentown Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. DeSimone v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API