Legal Opinion
Casey v. Geiger
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 4, 1985No. 2110PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMILIA, Judge:
Appellants contend that the lower court erred in sustaining appellees’ preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to counts IV and V of appellants’ amended complaint and in dismissing the amended complaint as against appellees. We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the Order of the court below.
On September 10, 1981, appellants Bridget Casey and her daughter, Lisa, filed a complaint against defendant James Geiger alleging false imprisonment, assault and battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, and against appellees, Borough of Camp Hill and Andrew…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- De Long v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Schuster v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
- Robson v. Penn Hills School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Mascaro v. Youth Study CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Redland Soccer Club, Inc. v. Department of the Army of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Love v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Alumni Ass'n, Delta Zeta Zeta of Lambda Chi Alpha Fraternity v. SullivanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Moore v. PA. DEPT. OF JUSTICECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.