Legal Opinion

Paraska v. Scranton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 11, 1933No. Appeal, 50PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Frazer,

Plaintiffs sued in trespass to recover damages for injuries received by the minor plaintiff in a fall from a swing on a public playground maintained by the City of Scranton. The court below entered judgment for defendant upon an affidavit of defense raising questions of law. Plaintiffs appealed.

The statement of claim avers that the playground where the accident occurred was under the control and supervision of employees of defendant city and that the child, a girl eleven years old, was present there during one of the regular recreation periods. The swing…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Devers v. Scranton CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Barthold v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  3. Weber v. HarrisburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Novak v. Ford City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Glase ex rel. Limeburner v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bingham v. BD. OF ED. OF OGDEN CITYUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Honaman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Hartness v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Hill v. Allentown Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. DeSimone v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API