Legal Opinion

Eckl v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 19, 1993No. CR 92-1188PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellant, Richard Eckl, pleaded guilty to sexual abuse in the first degree and was sentenced to three years probation and a $500 fine. Eckl contends the Trial Court erred by denying a motion to dismiss premised upon alleged violations of the statute of limitations and the speedy trial rule. Because we lack authority to hear Eckl’s appeal from a guilty plea, the appeal is dismissed.

The right of appeal in criminal cases is conferred upon “any person convicted of a misdemeanor or a felony ... in any circuit court of this state” by Arkansas R. Crim. P. 36.1 (1992). The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Finley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  4. Kennedy v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Young v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  2. Tabor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Scott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Berry v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API