Legal Opinion

Berry v. City of Fayetteville

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 16, 2003No. CR 03-381PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jim Hannah, Justice.

This case presents an appeal from a conditional plea of guilty under Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b) (2003). Bichard Berry submitted a guilty plea in Washington County Circuit Court conditioned on this court affirming the trial court’s decision that the City of Fayetteville (City) has the authority to regulate his racing activities and the trial court’s decision that Fayetteville City Ordinance 4366 is constitutional. Because Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b) limits review on conditional pleas of guilty to adverse determinations of pretrial motions to suppress illegally obtained evidence,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bilderback v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Tabor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Barnett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Canada v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  2. Engstrom v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  3. Dondanville v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. Smothers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API