Legal Opinion

Payne v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 13, 1997No. CA CR 96-867PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

The Arkansas Court of Appeals has certified to this court the State’s motion to dismiss the appeal of appellant Dolphus Paul Payne. The State’s motion has merit, and we dismiss the appeal due to Payne’s failure to comply with the requirements for review of a conditional guilty plea under Rule 24.3 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The facts leading up to the State’s motion are these. On July 10, 1995, Payne was charged with DWI in violation of Ark. Code Ann. § 5-65-103 (Repl. 1993), and driving with a suspended or revoked license in violation of Ark. Code…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  2. Bilderback v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Noble v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  4. Tabor v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  5. Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wofford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Ray v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. State v. SolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Beulah v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Mhoon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API