Legal Opinion

Jenkins v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1989No. CR 89-217PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt Jr.,

Chief Justice. The appellant, Mitchell Jenkins, was charged by information with the offense of DWI 4th Offense, and he initially pled not guilty. Prior to trial, Jenkins filed a “motion in limine to suppress use of prior [DWI] conviction for lack of proper waiver of counsel.” Thereafter, the trial court found that Jenkins had intelligently, knowingly, and voluntarily effected the waiver of counsel.

Later, Jenkins pled guilty to the charge of DWI 4th Offense pursuant to Ark. R. Crim. P. 24.3(b), under the assumption that it allowed him to enter a conditional plea of guilty by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. ShermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Scalco v. City of RussellvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  4. State v. Howard, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  5. Eckl v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API