Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 30, 1993No. C5-92-1537, C7-92-1538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

This appeal involves interpretation of Minnesota’s Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), Minn.Stat. §§ 609.901-912 (1990). A jury convicted Gary Allen Kelly of six counts of soliciting prostitution in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.322, subds. la(4)(a), 2(1), 2(4)(a) (1988), five counts of receiving profit derived from prostitution in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.323, subds. la, 2 (1988), and one count of racketeering in violation of Minn. Stat. § 609.903, subd. 1(1) (1990). Kelly also pleaded guilty to one count of soliciting prostitution in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. United States v. RiccobeneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Tuma v. Commissioner of Economic SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API