Legal Opinion
United States v. Riccobene
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 20, 1983No. Nos. 82-1399, 82-1410 to 1414PublishedCited by 227 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ADAMS, Circuit Judge.
The appellants in this case challenge their convictions under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. (“RICO”), and the federal gambling statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1955. Their primary argument is that the evidence failed to show beyond a reasonable doubt either that they were engaged in the conduct of a single on-going enterprise, as required for the RICO count for which they were convicted, or that their activity constituted a single conspiracy. They also contend that the jury could not properly have found that each…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- James Odom v. Microsoft Corporation, a Washington Corporation Best Buy Co., Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. AngiuloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.