Legal Opinion

State v. Kelly

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1994No. C5-92-1537, C7-92-1538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SIMONETT, Justice.

This appeal raises the same RICO issues as in State v. Trong Kim Huynh, 519 N.W.2d 191 (Minn.1994), also decided today. In this ease, we hold that the evidence is insufficient to show defendant was associated with an “enterprise” as that term is used in Minnesota’s Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. We therefore reverse the racketeering conviction.

Defendant-appellant Gary Allen Kelly and four codefendants were charged with assorted prostitution-related crimes, plus racketeering. The jury found defendant guilty of one count of soliciting…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. KragnessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  2. State v. Trong Kim HuynhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. State v. LongoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API