Legal Opinion
State v. Kelly
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 1994No. C5-92-1537, C7-92-1538Published
1Opinion of the Court
519 N.W.2d 202 (1994)
STATE of Minnesota, Respondent,
v.
Gary Allen KELLY, Petitioner, Appellant.
No. C5-92-1537, C7-92-1538.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
June 30, 1994.
John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Lawrence W. Pry, Asst. State Public Defender, St. Paul, for appellant.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, and Michael O. Freeman, Hennepin County Atty., Linda M. Freyer, Asst. County Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.
Heard, considered, and decided by the court en banc.
OPINION
SIMONETT, Justice.
This appeal raises the same RICO issues as in State v. Trong Kim Huynh, 519 N.W.2d 191…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. KragnessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- State v. Trong Kim HuynhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994