Legal Opinion

J. B. Colt Co. v. Freitas

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 21, 1926No. Docket No. 2999PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The plaintiff sued to recover the amount of a promissory note, dated May 29, 1922, alleged to be due from defendant. The note was given by defendant in consideration of the purchase by him from plaintiff of a carbide generator and equipment. The answer alleges in the usual form that the defendant was induced to make the purchase by plaintiff’s false and fraudulent representations. The representations alleged to be false are: “That on or about the 22nd day of May, 1922, plaintiff offered to sell to defendant one carbide generator with fixtures and one stove with pipes and fittings for the sum…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of CoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Bone v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Eade v. ReichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. California Credit & Collection Co. v. CarpenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. Darrow v. HoulihanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API