Wesco Electric Company v. Shook
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
We will refer to defendant in error Shook as claimant, and to plaintiffs in error as the employer or the insurance carrier.
The Referee who heard the evidence in support of the claim made findings that the claimant had not suffered an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment. Upon review before the Commission the following award was made: -
“In the above-entitled cause, the Commission having re-reviewed the entire file as prayed by the respondents’ petition filed herein on November 5, 1958, and now being further advised in the premises, finds:
“That the Referee’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Carroll v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Vanadium Corporation of America v. SargentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Industrial Commission v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Industrial Commission v. Corwin HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION v. FaulkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Industrial Commission v. HeslerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- T & T Loveland Chinchilla Ranch v. BournSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
- Martin Marietta Corp. v. TerrellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.