Legal Opinion

Kandt v. Evans

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 24, 1982No. 81SA50PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBOFSKY, Justice.

The plaintiff, Andrea S. Kandt, appeals the Denver District Court’s summary judgment dismissal of her tort action against her employer and co-employee for intentional infliction of emotional harm suffered in the course of her employment. 1 The district court determined that the Colorado Workmen’s Compensation statute, section 8 — 40-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973 and 1981 Supp. provides the exclusive remedy for the plaintiff’s injury and precludes the plaintiff’s intentional tort action. We affirm the district court’s ruling.

The defendants E. B. Evans and National Icee employed the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bryan v. Utah InternationalUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  2. O'QUINN v. Walt Disney Productions, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  3. Vanadium Corporation of America v. SargentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Elliott v. BrownAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Central Surety & Insurance v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Radil v. Sanborn Western Camps, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Meerbrey v. Marshall Field & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Vaughan v. McMinnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  5. Industrial Claim Appeals Office v. RomeroSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API