MARTIN MARIETTA CORPORATION v. Faulk
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Sutton.
This is a Workmen’s Compensation case.
Arthur D. Faulk will be referred to as the claimant or by name, the Industrial Commission of Colorado as the Commission, the Martin Marietta Corporation as the Company, and the Continental Casualty Company as the Insurer.
The sole question presented for our determination is whether there was sufficient evidence introduced to sustain the finding that the claimant’s hack injury was compensable as an industrial “accident” within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act as it existed prior to the 1963 revision thereof (C.R.S.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McNicol's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Carroll v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Vanadium Corporation of America v. SargentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
- Industrial Commission v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Industrial Commission v. Corwin HospitalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Popovich v. IrlandoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- In Re Quest. Sub. by US Ct. of AppealsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Allmendinger v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- Tolbert v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- T & T Loveland Chinchilla Ranch v. BournSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.